What, I wondered. Since there are surely something in the NLP, which I can use. Exactly, Milton'sche speech patterns . I thought about just a nice, albeit manipulative wording of my request. In the next break I was waiting for a suitable moment, I said to the speaker: "I ask myself: It's always okay for them that I used to go because I still have an important appointment, "He replied." What? Yes, of course. "I had, before the interval end, only to pick up even my certificate with him. When you pick up the certificate he told me that this was an exception. Actually, he issues the certificate only in the presence and seminar circuit.
Well, what shall I tell you. NLP makes it possible.
OK, I admit, the wait was at the appropriate moment is also important. But let's look at the whole, point by point.
- I waited until he was busy with something else to it then surprising to address. This is called a "pattern interrupt" (pattern interruption). With such a model one uses break from the inertia of our brain. While this is still busy with the processing of new and surprising situation, if you send after the next information. The person addressed in the short throws an irritant. On Rapport I did in this case deliberately, not to jeopardize the element of surprise.
- Into this confusion, I said: "I wonder ...". Now the expected opposite a question arises therefore an answer to.
- but instead I said: "..., it is always in order for them, I would go earlier, another "pattern interrupt" ...". Instead of the expected question came a statement
- to hedge, I still said to justify.. "... because I still have a important appointment. "The magic word in that sentence is the word" because. "This alone is to the brain suggest that there is a reason. How this looks is only secondary.
Yes, folks, so . Looks like if you've done your homework in terms of NLP I have harmed no one and still an advantage for me, "ermanipuliert" NLP Thank